Search for: "John Doe, No. 125" Results 1 - 20 of 318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2008, 10:32 am
Salzburg, Wyoming Attorney General; John W. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:37 am by scanner1
DON HALL, LORI STEWART, JERRY JASICKO, and TERESA JASICKO, and JOHN DOES 1-99, Defendants and Appellants. [read post]
Unsatisfactory rating voided because employee's "performance review," failed to comply with the employer's own procedures and thus undermined the integrity of the process Joyce v City of New York, 2018 NY Slip Op 03433, Appellate Division, First Department The Appellate Division annulled the determination of respondent New York City Department of Education [DOE] sustaining the "unsatisfactory" rating for the 2010-2011 academic year give to John Joyce, a tenured teacher. The court said that the record demonstrates "deficiencies in the performance review process" that resulted in Mr. Joyce being given an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year. Citing Matter of Gumbs v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 125 AD3d 484, and Matter of Richards v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 117 AD3d 605, the Appellate Division noted that these deficiencies "were not merely technical, but undermined the integrity and fairness of the process." Mr. Joyce had received a satisfactory rating for the previous academic year and, in contravention of its own procedures, DOE failed to place him on notice that he was in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year until after April 28, 2011. Although DOE's procedures required that tenured teachers in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating have "formal observations including a pre-observation and post-observation conference by the principal ... as part of a prescriptive plan to improve their teaching," Mr. Joyce received only one formal observation which took place one week before the end of the academic year and was not part of a prescriptive plan to improve his performance as a teacher. The decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_03433.htm
30 May 2018, 4:37 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dist. of the City of N.Y., 125 AD3d 484, and Matter of Richards v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 7:35 am
John in Carolina has some updates on the walk; so does Liestoppers discussion board. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 2:06 am
John Ibbitson of the Globe and Mail has a column today (unfortunately behind a paywall) on the copyright issue. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:51 am by Unknown
By John Filar AtwoodThe CFTC has awarded $1.25 million to a whistleblower whose responsibilities included compliance or internal audit functions at the subject company. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 9:42 pm
Yet, this does not surprise me because: On Wall Street, crime pays! [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:00 am by Adrienne Kendrick
As the settlement is between only the AAP and Google, it does not affect Google’s current litigation with the Authors Guild or otherwise address the underlying questions in that suit. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 8:34 am by Amy Howe
However, that decision also reduced, by approximately $125 per month, the amount of money that went to Sandra as her share of John’s retirement pay; by contrast, John received both the additional money that would otherwise have gone to Sandra and the savings from his disability benefits being tax-free. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am by John Elwood
John Elwood (finally) reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
13 Feb 2021, 3:10 am
/Passion, sacrifice, a twist: 125 years of book reviews offer the clue to Love Potion No. 9. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 1:47 pm
 Judge John Dietz set default judgment aside. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 1:47 pm
 Judge John Dietz set default judgment aside. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 4:03 am
  Senators Dianne Feinstein and John Cornyn have written to Prime Minister Stephen Harper to urge Canada to enact new anti-camcording legislation. [read post]